Lately, many people who not want iMac, but the gratification of every person is always changing and it is not because the iMac CNET Editors Choice award, though it was very helpful. Bangaimana tips the scales is the ability to use the machine as an external monitor low year from now.
From iMac I am contrived confused to choose between Mac and Windows that existence in the 1980s for my Mac. In college, i am moved into Windows I using to work on a computer, we installed the Mac. Then at CNET, also used it, therefore Windows, until until recently, when I adopted the existence of bi-OS. I do not understand about it. For me personally, the iMac is have reasons of reliability, grace under pressure, and the ability to snooze and wake up fast to keep pace with but I've directed away from the iMac for several reasons:
• I want quad-core processor, It does not matter anymore for me because with the new iMacs sport the latest Intel.
• I want more hard drive capacity for redundant images and video data and for backup. It's not a big problem with a fast connection to external drives Thunderbolt, although there will be chaos and perhaps lack of cable Thunderbolt hub ports until it arrives.
• I have the software I paid for Windows that I do not want to buy again for Mac OS X. Now I am part of my work in personal computing, though, and I need the original software can be transferred to a Mac without a price penalty.
• I do not like all in one design, because I prefer to buy an external monitor with a longer useful life of the processor and graphics chip.
But here the nice things you can do with the iMac is when it becomes old and tired, you can turn it into an external monitor. That means you can buy another machine and get some useful screen area. That idea makes me seriously think about the new iMac for my home machine that I use for photo and video editing.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar